Details for: 13T0500122, Trifolium fragiferum L., 'Fragan'


Summary Data
Taxonomy:
Trifolium fragiferum L.
Cultivar:
'Fragan'
Origin:
Origin – Czech Republic
Received by CRI:
2014
Improvement Status:
Advanced/improved cultivar
Life form:
Biennial and/or Perennial
Growth class:
spring
Is Core:
N
Form Received:
Seed
Availability
FormQuantityNoteInventoryCart
Seed0.2 gram13T0500122
curator must confirm the availability
Seed available for distribution is a limited resource. The quantity of seed distributed is hopefully sufficient to conduct the intended research. If additional seed is required, the recipient is urged to grow and reproduce the seed. Repeated requests for seed of the same accession will not be honored.
  
There are no images for this accession.

Core Passport Data
Taxonomy:
Trifolium fragiferum L.
Cultivar:
'Fragan'
Origin:
Origin – Czech Republic
Received by CRI:
2014
Improvement Status:
Advanced/improved cultivar
Life form:
Biennial and/or Perennial
Growth class:
spring
Is Core:
N
Form Received:
Seed
Source History
Accession Group(s)
Group name: Pícniny
Note: Fodder plants
To search for accessions in this group, click the following link. Pícniny

Accession Names and Identifiers
'Fragan'
Type: Cultivar name

Fragan
Type: National name

Trifolium fragiferum
Type: Full taxon

Narrative
Curator: Tomáš VYMYSLICKÝ, Research Institute for Fodder Plants, Ltd. (CZE096) vymyslicky@vupt.cz
Trifolium fragiferum L.
Genus:
Trifolium
Subgenus:
Trifolium
Section:
Vesicastrum
Family:
Fabaceae (alt. Leguminosae)
Subfamily:
Faboideae
Tribe:
Trifolieae
Nomen number:

40230
Place of publication:

Sp. pl. 2:772. 1753
Verified:
March 26, 2007 by ARS Systematic Botanists.
Other conspecific taxa
Autonyms (not in current use), synonyms and invalid designations
Autonym(s)
Trifolium fragiferum L. subsp. fragiferum

Homotypic Synonym(s)
Amoria fragifera (L.) Roskov

Heterotypic Synonym(s)
Amoria bonannii (C. Presl) Roskov
Trifolium bonannii C. Presl
Trifolium fragiferum L. subsp. bonannii (C. Presl) Soják
Trifolium neglectum C. A. Mey.

Common names
LANGUAGENAMEALTERNATE NAMENOTESEQCITATION
English strawberry clover 1 Wiersema, J. H. & B. León. 1999. World economic plants: a standard reference CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
French trèfle fraise 2 Rehm, S. 1994. Multilingual dictionary of agronomic plants
German Erdbeerklee 2 Rehm, S. 1994. Multilingual dictionary of agronomic plants
Italian trifoglio fragifero 2 International Seed Testing Association. 1982. A Multilingual Glossary of Common Plant-Names 1. Field crops, grasses and vegetables, ed. 2.
Japanese Rōmaji tsumekusa-damashi 2 Iwatsuki, K. et al. 1993-. Flora of Japan.
Spanish trébol fresero 2 Rehm, S. 1994. Multilingual dictionary of agronomic plants
Swedish smultronklöver 2 Aldén, B., S. Ryman, & M. Hjertson. 2012. Svensk Kulturväxtdatabas, SKUD (Swedish Cultivated and Utility Plants Database; online resource)
Transcribed Chinese cao mei che zhou cao 2 Wu Zheng-yi & P. H. Raven et al., eds. 1994-. Flora of China (English edition).
Annotations
Other Links
Actions
  • Curator Change: Previous: Daniela KNOTOVÁ, Current: Tomáš VYMYSLICKÝ. 14 May 2021.
  • Enter ECN Into System: . 02 May 2014.
  • Changed The Taxonomy Or Received: . 2012.
Pathogens
Vouchers
Citations
Pedigree
Pollination type:
(3) Individ. Selection
Description:
S- from wild forms followed by mass selection
Intellectual Property Rights
Czech registration. Issued: 01 Jan 2012.
MLS. (Multi-Lateral System FAO item.)
MLS.
FAO Standard Material Transfer Agreement.
Year of termination of breeding. Issued: 01 Jan 2009.

Observations

Phenotype Data

CategoryDescriptorDescriptionValueStudyInventoryAvailability
BIOLOGY039 Winter hardiness - resistance 8 - 81-90 %2019 Research Institute for Fodder Plants Ltd. Co (5) 
BIOLOGY040 Survival of plants during vegatation 9 - very good >85 %2019 Research Institute for Fodder Plants Ltd. Co (5) 
BIOLOGY041 Persistence 9 - very high >90 %2019 Research Institute for Fodder Plants Ltd. Co (5) 
BIOLOGY043 Lodging - resistance 9 - very high2019 Research Institute for Fodder Plants Ltd. Co (5) 
BIOLOGY044 Drought - resistance 3 - low2019 Research Institute for Fodder Plants Ltd. Co (5) 
CHEMICAL082 Dry matter - content of nitrogen atacks 5 - medium 16,1-18,0 %2013 Research Institute for Fodder Plants Ltd. Co. (3) 
CHEMICAL083 Dry matter - content of fibre 3 - low 12,0-18,0 %2013 Research Institute for Fodder Plants Ltd. Co. (3) 
MORPHOLOGY001 Cotyledons - indumentum 1 - absent or very weak2019 Research Institute for Fodder Plants Ltd. Co (5) 
MORPHOLOGY002 Cotyledons - size 1 - very small2019 Research Institute for Fodder Plants Ltd. Co (5) 
MORPHOLOGY005 Leaf rosette - shape (in autumn) 1 - prostrate2022 Research Institute for Fodder Plants Ltd. Co (13) 
MORPHOLOGY006 Leaf rosette - shape (in spring) 1 - prostrate2022 Research Institute for Fodder Plants Ltd. Co (13) 
MORPHOLOGY007 Leaf rosette - size 7 - large 18,1-24,0 cm2022 Research Institute for Fodder Plants Ltd. Co (13) 
MORPHOLOGY008 Spaced plant - morphobiotype 4 - is formed by flowering and non flowering stems with medium rosette2022 Research Institute for Fodder Plants Ltd. Co (13) 
MORPHOLOGY009 Spaced plant - shape 1 - prostrate2022 Research Institute for Fodder Plants Ltd. Co (13) 
MORPHOLOGY010 Spaced plant - number of stems (second year of life, first cut) 2 - 10,0-20,02022 Research Institute for Fodder Plants Ltd. Co (13) 
MORPHOLOGY011 Stem - shape in diameter 1 - rounded2019 Research Institute for Fodder Plants Ltd. Co (5) 
MORPHOLOGY012 Stem - colour 1 - light green2019 Research Institute for Fodder Plants Ltd. Co (5) 
MORPHOLOGY013 Stem - thickness 3 - thin2019 Research Institute for Fodder Plants Ltd. Co (5) 
MORPHOLOGY014 Stem - length 2 - 30- 40 cm2019 Research Institute for Fodder Plants Ltd. Co (5) 
MORPHOLOGY015 Stem - indumentum 1 - absent or very sparse2019 Research Institute for Fodder Plants Ltd. Co (5) 
MORPHOLOGY016 Stem - number of internodes 2 - 3,0- 4,02019 Research Institute for Fodder Plants Ltd. Co (5) 
MORPHOLOGY017 Stem - length of middle internode 3 - short 4,0- 6,0 cm2019 Research Institute for Fodder Plants Ltd. Co (5) 
MORPHOLOGY019 Leaflet terminal - shape 3 - round ovate2013 Research Institute for Fodder Plants Ltd. Co. (3) 
MORPHOLOGY020 Leaflet terminal - colour 5 - green2013 Research Institute for Fodder Plants Ltd. Co. (3) 
MORPHOLOGY021 Leaflet terminal - margin 7 - serrate2013 Research Institute for Fodder Plants Ltd. Co. (3) 
MORPHOLOGY022 Leaflet terminal - indumentum 1 - absent or very sparse2013 Research Institute for Fodder Plants Ltd. Co. (3) 
MORPHOLOGY023 Leaflet terminal - pattern 1 - absent2013 Research Institute for Fodder Plants Ltd. Co. (3) 
MORPHOLOGY024 Leaflet terminal - legth 3 - short 15,0-30,0 mm2013 Research Institute for Fodder Plants Ltd. Co. (3) 
MORPHOLOGY025 Leaflet terminal - width 3 - narrow 6,0-15,0 mm2013 Research Institute for Fodder Plants Ltd. Co. (3) 
MORPHOLOGY026 Leaflet terminal - area 4 - 5,1- 7,0 cm22013 Research Institute for Fodder Plants Ltd. Co. (3) 
MORPHOLOGY027 Leaf - polyphyly 1 - spontaneous2019 Research Institute for Fodder Plants Ltd. Co (5) 
MORPHOLOGY028 Inflorescence - shape 2 - spherical2013 Research Institute for Fodder Plants Ltd. Co. (3) 
MORPHOLOGY029 Inflorescence - length 1 - very short <16,0 mm2013 Research Institute for Fodder Plants Ltd. Co. (3) 
MORPHOLOGY030 Inflorescence - width 3 - narrow 6,0-15,0 mm2013 Research Institute for Fodder Plants Ltd. Co. (3) 
MORPHOLOGY031 Inflorescence - number of flowers 4 - 51- 652013 Research Institute for Fodder Plants Ltd. Co. (3) 
MORPHOLOGY032 Inflorescence - number per stem 1 - very few <2,02013 Research Institute for Fodder Plants Ltd. Co. (3) 
MORPHOLOGY033 Corolla - colour 4 - light pink2013 Research Institute for Fodder Plants Ltd. Co. (3) 
MORPHOLOGY034 Seed - shape 5 - elliptical2022 Research Institute for Fodder Plants Ltd. Co (13) 
MORPHOLOGY035 Seed - colour 3 - brown2022 Research Institute for Fodder Plants Ltd. Co (13) 
MORPHOLOGY066 Stand - density 9 - very dense2019 Research Institute for Fodder Plants Ltd. Co (5) 
MORPHOLOGY070 Stand - number of cuts during the year 6 - 4 cuts under favourable conditions2013 Research Institute for Fodder Plants Ltd. Co. (3) 
MORPHOLOGY076 Stand - yield share in the first cut to the whole yield per year 5 - medium 62,6- 70,0 %2013 Research Institute for Fodder Plants Ltd. Co. (3) 
MORPHOLOGY077 Stand - intensity of flowering 9 - very high2013 Research Institute for Fodder Plants Ltd. Co. (3) 
OTHER109 Main utilization 2 - mixture with grass2022 Research Institute for Fodder Plants Ltd. Co (13) 
PRODUCTION036 Seed - 1000-seed weight 5 - medium 1,61-2,00 g2013 Research Institute for Fodder Plants Ltd. Co. (3) 
PRODUCTION042 Longevity 9 - perennial2019 Research Institute for Fodder Plants Ltd. Co (5) 
PRODUCTION045 Suitability for mixtures 5 - good2019 Research Institute for Fodder Plants Ltd. Co (5) 
PRODUCTION065 Stand - vigour before harvesting 7 - good2019 Research Institute for Fodder Plants Ltd. Co (5) 
PRODUCTION072 Yield - green matter (to the standard cv.) 5 - medium 95,1-105,0 %2013 Research Institute for Fodder Plants Ltd. Co. (3) 
PRODUCTION073 Stand - yield hay (to the standard cv.) 5 - medium 95,1-105,0 %2013 Research Institute for Fodder Plants Ltd. Co. (3) 
PRODUCTION079 Stand - seed yield (to the standard cv.) 1 - very low < 45,0 %2013 Research Institute for Fodder Plants Ltd. Co. (3)